Newman v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis
87 F.3d 358 · 1996
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 1611 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital · Forest Conservation Council v. Rosboro Lumber Co. · City of Edmonds v. United States Department of Labor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and determining that, because no such information existed, there would be no exception to the standard RMA method under 42 U.S.C. S 1382(c)(4). That regulation reads: 12 (c) Reliable information which is currently available for determining benefits. The Commissioner has determined that no reliable information exists which is currently available to use in determining benefit amounts. 13 (1) Reliable information. For purposes of this section,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a primary purpose of requiring agencies to act by regulation is to prevent ad hoc policy determinations. When Congress says that the Commissioner shall prescribe circumstances by regulation, we see no reason why the Commissioner should be entitled to prescribe circumstances by other means.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“determines that reliable information is currently available with respect to the income and other circumstances of an individual.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.