Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 F.3d 429 - White v. Gregory

White v. Gregory’s Empirical Analysis

87 F.3d 429 · 1996

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
June 2012
most recently cited

34 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently June 2012 · most notably Jones v. Ml Greninger (1999), Schlicher v. Thomas (1997)

34 federal appellate ·

530199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Coppedge v. United States · Gilliam v. United States · James M. Debardeleben v. J.M. Quinlan, R.L. Matthews, N.W. Smith, R.G. Simpson, E. Cave, and W.A. Blount · Twyman v. Crisp · Ragan v. Cox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'a financial inability to pay the required filing fees and the existence of a reasoned, non-frivolous argument on the law and facts in support of'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Our review of the [PLRA] leads us to conclude [that it does] not apply when ... the prisoner/appellant filed his notice of appeal before April 26, 1996, the date President Clinton signed the [PLRA] into law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the sole basis of [the inmate's] claim is that hewas allowed to use the library only two hours per week. Prisoners are not entitled to unlimited access to the law library, and we agree with the district court's conclusion that the limitation on [the inmate's] access did not amount to a constitutional violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.