Williams v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis
87 F.3d 702 · 1996
Citation profile
18 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably Bowers 05-2269 v. National Collegiate Athletic Association Ncaa, Maurice Taylor v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division (2001)
18 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Smith v. Barry · Pickens v. Lockheed Corp. · Intel Corporation v. Terabyte International, Inc., Jean Hsu, Kenneth Hsu · Ingraham v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we have previously recognized that where a Rule 60(b) motion is filed after the notice of appeal from the underlying judgment, a separate notice of appeal is required in order to preserve the denial of the Rule 60(b) motion for appellate review”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“we are obligated to examine the basis for our jurisdiction, sua sponte, if necessary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Chunn v. Chunn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.