Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 F.3d 774 - Total Marine Services, Inc. v. Director, Office of Worker's Compensation Programs

Total Marine Services, Inc. v. Director, Office of Worker's Compensation Programs’s Empirical Analysis

87 F.3d 774 · 1996

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 2020

9 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

1201996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital · County of Los Angeles v. Chavez-Salido · Standard Oil Company v. Edward Anderson · Richardson v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc. · Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a borrowing employer is required to pay the compensation benefits of its borrowed employee, and, in the absence of a valid and enforceable indemnification agreement , the borrowing employer is required to reimburse an injured worker's formal employer for any compensation benefits it has paid to the injured worker.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[I]t is irrelevant for purposes of the instant motion whether or not Forest Oil [i.e., the borrowing employer,] secured payment of workers’ compensation for its borrowed employees. [The labor supply company, i.e., the formal employer,] provided Hudson with compensation benefits through its insurer.... Hudson’s exclusive remedy for the injuries he suffered ... is the workers’ compensation benefits he has already received. Accordingly, [the borrowing employer] is entitled to tort immunity under § 905(a).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “employer,” the definition merely limits the meaning of the term to those who employ employees for at least some”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.