Nelson v. Hamilton

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 20, 2004

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-02-20

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2004

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2004-02-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Ricky Donnell Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Nelson v. Hamilton, No. CA-02-605-2 (E.D.Va. Sept. 12, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED