Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

87 F. App'x 950

United States v. Salas

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 18, 2004

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-02-18

Relies on Anders v. California

Decided 2004-02-18

PER CURIAM.*

¶1Counsel appointed to represent Oscar Salas on direct appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Salas has not filed a response to counsel’s Andersbrief. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

¶2 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

/87/fappx/950 · .json · Public domain