Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 FSUPP2D 383 - Schaeuble v. Reno

Schaeuble v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 2004
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1337 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974) · 5 U.S.C. § 702 · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on United States v. Testan · United States v. Sherwood · United States v. Mitchell · Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla. · Honig v. Doe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) makes a determination under subsection (d)(3) of this section not to amend an individual’s record in accordance with his request, or fads to make such review in conformity with that subsection; (B) refuses to comply with an individual request under subsection (d)(1) of this section [dealing with access to records]; (C) fails to maintain any record concerning any individual with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness as is necessary to assure fairness in any determination relating to the qualifications, character, rights, or opportunities of, or benefits to the individual that may be made on the basis of such record, and consequently a determination is made which is adverse to the individual; or (D) fails to comply with any other provision of this section, or any rule promulgated thereunder, in such a way as to have an adverse effect on an individual,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. 305 F. Supp. 2d 478 - Duke v. United States

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.