Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 FSUPP3D 1195 - In re Animation Workers Antitrust Litigation

In re Animation Workers Antitrust Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
May 2016
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 15B (Sherman Antitrust Act)

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · Max Lopez Jr v. Ga Smith Larry Loo a Acevedo Patterson 4a-2r · Lee v. City of Los Angeles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All persons who worked at any time from 2004 to the present for Pixar, Lu-casfilm, DreamWorks Animation, Walt Disney Animation Studios, Walt Disney Feature Animation, Blue Sky Studios, Digital Domain, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation or Sony Pictures Imageworks in the United States. Excluded from the Class are officers, directors, senior executives and personnel in the human resources and recruiting departments of the Defendants.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 123 F. Supp. 3d 1175 - In re Animation Workers Antitrust Litigation
  2. “.Quick question from me, for those of you who can share the info. What is your salary increase budget for FY ’07? Ours is [REDACTED] but we may manage it to closer to [REDACTED] on average. Are you doing anything close, more, or less?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 123 F. Supp. 3d 1175 - In re Animation Workers Antitrust Litigation
  3. “detailed allegations of when and where certain Defendants met arid conspired,” but the Court concluded that these allegations showed only that the defendants”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. 147 F. Supp. 3d 868 - Ryan v. Microsoft Corp.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.