87 F. Supp. 3d 322 - App Dynamic Ehf v. Vignisson’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 701 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 702 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)
Relies on Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. Hall · Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co. · Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. Brown · Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt · GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where there is no showing of how jurisdictional discovery would help plaintiff discover anything new, 'it [is] inappropriate to subject [defendants] to the burden and expense of discovery.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the D.C.C.A. emphasized the provoking of government action against another; it did not premise jurisdiction on the mere filing of a fraudulent petition”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Although discovery should be granted freely, it can be denied when the plaintiff has failed to present facts that could establish jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.