Jacoby v. Kiesling

¶1Where a judge appointed as receiver of the assets of an insolvent ñrm. a fit and proper person, who was the choice of a large majority, in amount and number, of the creditors, and no good reason appeared why he should have appointed another person at the instance of a single creditor whose claim against the firm was comparatively small, such action of the judge was manifestly proper, and will not be disturbed. Judgme t affirmed.