Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 Ill. 2d 241 - Albaugh v. Cooley

87 Ill. 2d 241 - Albaugh v. Cooley’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2010

23 state decisions

1701981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 37 Ill. 2d 494 - Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern Railroad · 85 Ill. 2d 1 - Alvis v. Ribar · Walker v. New Mexico & Southern Pacific Railroad · Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Dunleavy · 10 Ill. 2d 28 - Paul Harris Furniture Co. v. Morse

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““§65. Verdict—Special interrogatories. Unless the nature of the case requires otherwise, the jury shall render a general verdict. The jury may be required by the court, and must be required on request of any party, to find specially upon any material question or questions of fact stated to them in writing. Special interrogatories shall be tendered, objected to, ruled upon and submitted to the jury as in the case of instructions. Submitting or refusing to • submit a question of fact to the jury may be reviewed on appeal, as a ruling on a question of law. When the special finding of fact is inconsistent with the general verdict, the former controls the latter and the court may render judgment accordingly.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.