Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 ILLAPP 111 - Shires v. Irwin

Shires v. Irwin’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
April 1959
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Behrensmeyer v. Kreitz · People v. Sisson · McKinnon v. People ex rel. Malzacher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It must be admitted that the notices might have been drawn with more definiteness as to the proposition to build a school house, but yet, considering the notice as a whole, we are of the opinion it was sufficiently specific to enable the voters to know and understand what they were to vote upon. . . . What was this bond to be issued for ? Clearly, to raise money to build a new school house as stated in the notice.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““For issuing a bond to the amount of 4 hundred dollars to be paid one year from date with interest not to exceed 7 per cent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.