Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 KAN 142 - Sly v. Powell

Sly v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2008

23 state decisions

701912192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tefft v. Wilcox · Pettigrew v. Lewis & Willard · McCurdy v. Baker · Morris v. Vanlaningham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It may be said here that, while some palpable conditions may be understood and stated by a layman, the questions whether there was a fracture of the bone, or whether the articular surfaces of the joint were normal, . . . and whether, in the condition of the finger, appellant had given the patient skillful and proper treatment, should not be determined on the testimony of unskilled witnesses.” (p. 148.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.