Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

87 Kan. 175

Sexton v. Deiter

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 11, 1912

Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1912-05-11

<p>HEADNOTE BY THE REPORTER.</p> <p>Malpractice — Physician—Prima, Facie Case — For Jury. The evidence established a prima facie case. Whether the prima facie case was overcome by the defendant’s evidence was for the jury to determine.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1934

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1912-05-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam:

¶1The plaintiff was uninjured before taking the anaesthetic. As soon as she became conscious again she found that she had been burned. She could not burn herself, and there was evidence that the defendant’s assistant did not burn her. Nobody else except the defendant had an opportunity to do so. The defendant admitted on separate occasions that he inflicted the wound, and the circumstances all indicated that he must have done so. Therefore the plaintiff’s evidence establishes a prima facie case. Whether the prima facie case was overcome by the evidence upon which the defendant relies was a matter for the jury to determine.

¶2The judgment is affirmed.

/87/kan/175 · .json · Public domain