Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 KAN 32 - Johnston v. Lanter

Johnston v. Lanter’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 1968
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 1968

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

50191219201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The usual rule is that on delivery the buyer must- promptly inspect the goods and determine whether they meet the requirements of the contract, and if defects are found he must promptly notify the seller.” (p. 36.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.