Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 KAN 582 - Martin v. Battey

Martin v. Battey’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
6
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2006

22 state decisions

901912192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Washburn v. Van Steenwyk · Ophir Silver Mining Co. v. Superior Court · Medill v. Snyder · Mayor of Nashville v. Webb · Peterson v. Fowler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Action for the following causes must be brought in the county in which the subject of the action is situated, . . . For the recovery of real property, or of any estate or interest therein, or for the determination in any form of any such right or interest, or to bar any defendant therefrom.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.