Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 KAN 861 - State v. Tassell

State v. Tassell’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 1957
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1957

7 state decisions

2019121920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Reed · State v. Sorter · State v. Dickson · State v. Cook · State v. McDonald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “". . . Under the statute it is the duty of the county attorney, of course, to make the indorsement, so that the defendant may make inquiry concerning the standing and credibility of the witnesses who are to testify against him. The requirement, however, is not so mandatory or essential that noncompliance with it necessarily invalidates the information or defeats the prosecution. . . .” (1. c. 863.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.