87 Mass. App. Ct. 238 - Commonwealth v. Cano’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Hill v. Lockhart · Padilla v. Kentucky · Commonwealth v. Saferian · Commonwealth v. Grace · Mattis v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“largely dependent on his family members in the United States for many of the basic requirements of daily life”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Lys“crimes involving moral turpitude not arising out of a single scheme of criminal misconduct,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“he was unable to read the driver's manual or take the written test”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.