87 Md. App. 250 - Suggs v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on MacK v. State · Prout v. State · Smallwood v. State · Frantz v. United States · State v. Runge
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because he reasonably feared that he would personally incur the greater wrath of the already outraged trial judge.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“painted such a prejudicial portrait of the defense counsel as to deny [the defendant] his right to a fair trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When the jurors returned, the court informed them, `The reason for the judge's action is because the defendant's lawyer was about ten miles out of limit.' Shortly thereafter the court asked the jury to `disregard the sideshow.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.