Dopkowski v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1992
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Parren v. State · Chase v. State · State v. Bryan · Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the instant case, many reasons could be advanced for a response other than incarceration. One reason is the cost to the community of incarcerating someone who has individually undertaken treatment for the underlying problem and who no longer appears to be a threat to the larger community. Additionally, incarceration is not a good environment for rehabilitating a recovering addict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dopkowski“it would be an abuse of discretion to fail to consider that a probationer has undertaken treatment and is controlling the underlying problem which precipitated the violations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dopkowski
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.