Lind v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis
1902
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2002
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“purely ministerial. He is not authorized to create or adopt a name for a candidate, but to accept the [political party] name suggested in the nomination papers, which must be a proper one * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schiff v. Griffin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.