Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 N.C. App. 156 - State v. Moore

87 N.C. App. 156 - State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2018

10 state decisions

601987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bullard · State v. Smith · State v. Joyner · State v. Triplett · State v. Diaz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A defendant acts in concert with another to commit a crime when he acts in harmony or in conjunction with another pursuant to a common criminal plan or purpose.” To be convicted of a crime under the theory of acting in concert, the defendant need not do any particular act constituting some part of the crime. All that is necessary is that the defendant be “present at the scene of the crime” and that he “act[] together with another who does the acts necessary to constitute the crime pursuant to a common plan or purpose to commit the crime.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “All that is necessary is that the defendant be 'present at the scene of the crime' and that 'he act together with another who does the acts necessary to constitute the crime pursuant to a common plan or purpose to commit the crime.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.