Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 NEB 845 - Hanika v. State

Hanika v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2017

5 state decisions

2019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gandy v. State · Nebraska Children's Home Society v. State · Pollock v. School District No. 42 · State ex rel. Skirving v. Bethea

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the Criminal Code the defendant must be ar raigned and be required to plead, and if he stand mute the court is required to enter a plea of not guilty in his behalf. Such is not the rule in a contempt proceeding. In such cases we have held that defendant in contempt, who refuses to plead, may be treated by the court as admitting the charges contained in the information.” Hanika v. State, 87 Neb. 845 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.