Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 Nev. 393 - Kotecki v. Augusztiny

Kotecki v. Augusztiny’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2014

10 state decisions

6019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Schroeder v. City of New York · Villalon v. Bowen · Forrester v. Southern Pacific Co. · Bodine v. Stinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'(W)hen notice is a person's due, process which is a mere gesture is not due process. The means employed must be such as one desirous of actually informing the absentee might reasonably adopt to accomplish it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.