Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 N.M. 12 - State v. Baca

State v. Baca’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
2
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently January 2009 · most notably State v. Cordova (1989), State v. Bowers (1974)

51 state decisions

2101974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ker v. State of California · Miller v. United States · Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United States · Henry v. Mississippi · Railroad Commission v. Maxcy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * an officer, prior to forcible entry, must give notice of authority and purpose, and be denied admittance. This is a general standard. Noncompliance with this standard is justified if exigent circumstances exist. Examples, but not a catalogue, of exigent circumstances are: (1) when, prior to entry, officers in good faith believe that they or someone within are in peril of bodily harm; or (2) when prior to entry, officers in good faith believe that the person to be arrested is fleeing or attempting to destroy evidence. These standards apply both to an officer executing a search warrant and to an officer making an arrest on probable cause. * * * The reasonableness of each search and seizure is to be decided upon its own facts and circumstances in light of these general standards. * * * "If there are exigent circumstances they must be known to the officers beforehand. * * *"”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.