Cone v. Amoco Production Company’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cave v. Cave · Tome Land & Improvement Co. v. Silva · Floyd Williams v. Humble Oil & Refining Company · Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Millette · 163 So. 2d 406 - Breaux v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well settled in New Mexico that the appellate court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court in weighing the evidence. If the trial court’s findings are supported by substantial evidence, they must be affirmed. Cave v. Cave, 81 N.M. 797 , 474 P.2d 480 (1970). Substantial evidence means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might find adequate to support a conclusion. Cave v. Cave, supra.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.