87 Ohio App. 3d 329 - State v. Kutz’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2024
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · 9 Ohio App. 3d 1 - State v. Thorpe · State v. Hitchens · 75 Mich. App. 415 - People v. Cords
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In the present case, a valid search warrant was obtained prior to obtaining the [bodily] sample[s] from [Cutter]. Because police had a valid search warrant, whether [Cutter] was under arrest at the time the [bodily] sample[s] [were] obtained is of no consequence." Kutz supra, 622 N.E.2d at 365 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cutter v. State“[t]he plea of no contest is not an admission of defendant's guilt, but is an admission of the truth of the facts alleged in the indictment[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he trial court needs only to examine the facts alleged in the indictment to determine whether a defendant is guilty of the crime charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.