87 Ohio App. 3d 48 - Campbell v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2024
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 24 Ohio St. 3d 112 - Griffith v. J.C. Penney Co. · 141 Ohio St. 124 - State Ex Rel. Ford v. Board of Education of City School District · 81 Ohio App. 3d 312 - Halluer v. Emigh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well established that neither the defense of laches nor principles of estoppel will apply against the state, its agencies or agents when exercising governmental functions. . . . The rationale behind this rule is one of public policy. The public should not suffer due to the inaction of public officials. . . . This reasoning applies with equal force to the defense of implied waiver. Waiver is a concept which applies to an individual who freely waives his own rights and privileges. . . . The public interest may not be waived.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The public interest may not be waived. [28 Am.Jur.2d, supra, at § 161, p. 847]. Just as with laches and estoppel, it would not be sound public policy to allow individuals employed by [the county child support enforcement agency] to waive the public's right to the support arrearages owed by [the appellee].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The rationale behind this rule is one of public policy; the public should not suffer due to the inaction of public officials.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.