Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

87 Ohio App. 3d 496

622 N.E.2d 688

Rollison v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1993

Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1993-07-08

Relies on 45 Ohio St. 2d 130 - In re Singer · 36 Ohio St. 3d 189 - In re Jackson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-07-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2021

10 state decisions

401993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*497 Per Curiam.

¶1 This matter is before the court on relator Timothy L. Rollison’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Relator contends his right to a speedy trial has been violated.

¶2 The Ohio Supreme Court has held that an appeal rather than a writ of habeas corpus is the proper remedy to challenge alleged violations of the right to a speedy trial. In re Singer (1976), 45 Ohio St.2d 130, 74 O.O.2d 253, 341 N.E.2d 849, In re Jackson (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 189, 522 N.E.2d 540. As we are bound by these Supreme Court rulings, the relief demanded by petitioner is hereby denied. However, we invite the Ohio Supreme Court to revisit this issue as we question the use of appeals in remedying an accused’s possible unconstitutional incarceration.

¶3 Relief denied.

Handwork, Melvin L. Resnick and Sherck, JJ., concur.
/87/ohioapp3d/496 · .json · Public domain