87 Ohio App. 3d 543 - Campbell v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably 174 Ohio App. 3d 398 - American Energy Corp. v. Datkuliak (2007), City of Hilliard v. First Industrial, L.P. (2005)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co. · Smith v. Flesher · 142 Ohio St. 91 - Lester v. Leuck · State v. Graham · 28 Ohio St. 3d 190 - State v. Gilmore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the exclusion of such evidence must affect a substantial right of the party and (2) the substance of the excluded evidence was made known to the court by proffer or was apparent from the context within which questions were asked.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If a party claiming error is unable to establish the first requirement, the error is deemed harmless. If the party is unable to establish the second requirement, the error is deemed waived.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Error may not be predicated upon a ruling which * * * excludes evidence unless a substantial right of the party is affected, and * * * the substance of the evidence was made known to the court by offer or was apparent from the context within which questions were asked. Offer of proof is not necessary if evidence is excluded during cross-examination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. G.P. v. L.P.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.