87 Ohio App. 3d 848 - Dickerson v. Dickerson’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably 98 Ohio App. 3d 748 - Moell v. Moell (1994), Morford v. Morford (2018)
48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 42 Ohio App. 3d 155 - In Re Dissolution of Marriage of Seders · 24 Ohio App. 3d 67 - Saeks v. Saeks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) an actual living together; (2) of a sustained duration; and (3) with shared expenses with respect to financing and day-to-day incidental expenses.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“When an ambiguous term * * * is incorporated into a divorce decree, the court that issued the decree has broad discretion in clarifying ambiguous language `by considering not only the intent of the parties but the equities involved.' In re Dissolution of Marriage of Seders (1987), 42 Ohio App.3d 155 , 156.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Whether or not a particular living arrangement rises to the level of lifestyle known as 'cohabitation' is a factual question to be initially determined by the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sage v. Gallagher
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.