Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 OHIOST3D 378 - State v. Madrigal

State v. Madrigal’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

1,777
cited by 1,777 later decisions
3
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1,755 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,777 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Issa (2001), State v. LaMar (2002)

7 federal appellate · 1,755 state decisions

7730200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Ohio v. Roberts · State v. Bradley · Wainwright v. Witt

Cited together with Strickland v. Washington · State v. Bradley · State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,777 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) that counsel's deficient performance prejudiced the defendant resulting in an unreliable or fundamentally unfair outcome of the proceeding.”
    76 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[F]ailure to file a suppression motion does not constitute per se ineffective assistance of counsel.”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “`However, in order even to consider whether”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.