State v. Madrigal’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1,755 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 1,777 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Issa (2001), State v. LaMar (2002)
7 federal appellate · 1,755 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Ohio v. Roberts · State v. Bradley · Wainwright v. Witt
Cited together with Strickland v. Washington · State v. Bradley · State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,777 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) that counsel's deficient performance prejudiced the defendant resulting in an unreliable or fundamentally unfair outcome of the proceeding.”
76 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[F]ailure to file a suppression motion does not constitute per se ineffective assistance of counsel.”
18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“`However, in order even to consider whether”
16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.