Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 Okla. 289 - Pippin v. McVickers

Pippin v. McVickers’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 1981
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 1981

5 state decisions

301922193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hale v. Broe · Shaffer v. Tyrrell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In all cases in the district or superior court, in which a receiver may be appointed, or refused, the party aggrieved may, within ten days thereafter, appeal from the order of the court, or a judge thereof, refusing to appoint, or refusing to vacate the appointment of a receiver, to the Supreme Court, without awaiting the final determination of such cause. * * *””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““* * * It is immaterial what reasons prompted the Legislature to word the law as we find it. The statute is plain and unambiguous, and it does not provide for an appeal from an order appointing a receiver.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.