Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 Okla. 299 - Denison v. Phipps

Denison v. Phipps’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
4
states following
March 1980
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 1980 · most notably Nickel v. Janda (1925), Clem Oil Co. v. Oliver (1924)

3 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

1501922193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cooper Manuf'G Co of Mount Vernon Ohio v. Ferguson · Security Trust & Savings Bank of Charles City v. Gleichmann · Fuller v. Allen · Elwood Oil & Gas Co. v. Gano · Shawnee Life Ins. Co. v. Watkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The question now presented is, What is meant by transacting business? The best definition we can think of for this phrase is the doing or performing a series of acts which occupy the time, attention, and labor of men for the purpose of livelihood, profit, or pleasure. It is well settled upon authority that the doing of a single act pertaining to a particular business or transaction will not be considered carrying on, transacting, or doing business. The mere term itself implies more than one transaction.’ “ ‘ “The doing of a single act of business in another state does not constitute the doing of business within the meaning of foreign corporation laws.” ’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““No foreign corporation, as above defined, which shall fail to comply with this article, can maintain any suit or action, either legal or equitable, in any of the courts of this state, upon any demand, whether arising out of contract or tort.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.