From Multnomah: Calvin U. Gantenbein, Judge. Action by Jobn Ditcbbnrn against R. E. Capíes and A. B. Capíes to recover an alleged balance due on a promissory note. Trial to tbe court and from a judgment rendered in favor of defendants, plaintiff appealed. Statement by Mb. Justice Mc-Camant. This is an action brought; to recover a balance of $150 still unpaid on a note for $400 given by defendants to plaintiff.
¶21. The evidence in this case is conflicting. We are bound by the findings of the Circuit Court in so far as *648they are supported by any evidence. The court found that plaintiff sold to the defendants ten or twelve wagons, an electric motor, a wood-saw, a conveyor and other personal property which he did not own; that plaintiff’s representations that he owned these articles were false and that defendants purchased in reliance on them; also that the personal property so sold to defendants was taken from them by the true owner. In all of these respects the findings are supported by evidence.
¶4It satisfactorily appears that the assets which defendants secured were worth less than the amount which they paid plaintiff, but this evidence does not entitle them to relief. They may have made an improvident bargain.
¶5The judgment is reversed and a new trial is ordered.
