People v. Oglethorpe’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably People v. Villa (2009), People v. Dash (2004)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Specht v. Patterson · McKune Warden et al. v. Lile · Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp. · People v. Fuller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e may assume that the trial court examined the proposed findings and agreed that they correctly stated the facts as the court found them to be; otherwise, the court would not have adopted them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Chipman“Procedural due process involves the manner in which state action occurs and requires notice and a fair opportunity to be heard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Mendoza“continue to present a danger to the public [if] released from incarceration and supervision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Komar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.