State v. Henry’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 2007 · most notably State v. Barnett (1984), State v. Wilson (1980)
1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Peck · State v. Geelan · State v. Nelson · State v. Greene · State v. Scott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * As a reviewing court we must view the evidence in light most favorable to the state on appeal from a conviction. This court held in State v. Geelan, 1963, 80 S.D. 135 , 120 N.W.2d 533 , 536: ‘Accepting the state’s evidence and indulging the most favorable inferences which can fairly be drawn therefrom, as the jury had a right to do, we have no hesitancy in holding that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict.’ The North Dakota Supreme Court has so held in State v. Moe, 1967, 151 N.W.2d 310 .””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Neitzel · State v. Myers““The test of the sufficiency of an information under these provisions is whether it apprises a defendant with reasonable certainty of the nature of the accusation against him so that he may prepare his defense and plead the judgment as a bar to any subsequent prosecution for the same offense. State v. Sinnott, 72 S.D. 100 , 30 N.W.2d 455 ; State v. Wood, 77 S.D. 120 , 86 N.W.2d 530 ; State v. Belt, 79 S.D. 324 , 111 N.W.2d 588 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Myers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.