State v. Bosanco’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1985
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bumper v. North Carolina · State v. Spry · State v. Batterman · Holland v. Parker · 38 Ala. App. 584 - Blevins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A careful reading of the transcript would indicate that the appellant was never arrested or charged with any offense before consenting to the blood test. The best that Sheriff Pearson could say was that he advised appellant “that he would be charged with DWI”, and that “I considered him to be under arrest when I read him the implied consent law. I didn’t tell him he was under arrest”, and at the preliminary hearing, in answer to the question “He was never arrested?” answered “No, I have nothing to do with that”. Id. at 607 , 213 N.W.2d at 346 (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hackney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.