Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 SO2D 146 - Raborn v. Heard

Raborn v. Heard’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
October 1977
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 1977

12 state decisions

40195619601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Tomko · Richardson v. Administrator, Etc. · 85 So. 2d 275 - Stroy v. Heard · Canada Dry Bottling Co. v. Board of Review, Industrial Commission · Walsworth v. Heard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * In any proceeding under this Section the findings of the board of review as to the facts, if supported by evidence and in the absence of fraud, shall be conclusive, and the jurisdiction of the court shall be confined to questions of law. No additional evidence shall be received by the court * * *.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) In determining whether or not any work is suitable for an individual, the administrator shall consider the degree of risk involved to his health, safety and morals, his physical fitness and prior training, his experience and prior earnings, his length of unemployment and prospects for securing local work in his customary occupation, and the distance of the available work from his residence. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Of course, for purposes of drawing >-unemployment compensation employees ■ cannot arbitrarily remove themselves from availability for work by restricting their willingness to work to certain hours, types of work, or conditions, not usual or customary in the occupation, trade, or industry, * * * * ” (Citations omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.