Noeling v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2017
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 152 Ohio St. 164 - In Re Frinzl · 84 So. 2d 560 - In Re Estate of Zimmerman · 132 W. Va. 875 - In Re Sutton, Inf. · 72 So. 2d 280 - Moore v. Lee · 154 Ohio St. 296 - State Ex Rel. Clark v. Allaman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"It is perfectly obvious from an examination of the language of the entire Act [Juvenile Court Act, Chapt. 39, Fla. Stat., F.S.A.] as well as the consideration of its legislative history and its historical background that it was the purpose and intent of the Legislature in enacting the Act under consideration to provide a forum which could consider the problems of dependent children in an informal fashion without the necessity of applying the strictness and technicalities that often accompany routine litigation."”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.