Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 SO3D 401 - In re Hooker

In re Hooker’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on William Marbury v. James Madison · Nixon v. United States · Hunt v. Wright · Lang v. Board of Supervisors · Ex parte Wren

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1) a textually demonstrable constitutional commitment of the issue to a coordinate political department; or 2) a lack of judicially discoverable and manageable standards for resolving it; or 3) the impossibility of deciding without an initial policy determination of a kind clearly for nonjudicial discretion; or 4) the impossibility of a court’s undertaking independent resolution without expressing lack of the respect due coordinate branches of government; or 5) an unusual need for unquestionable adherence to a political decision already made; or 6) the potentiality of embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on one question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “state government was modeled after the federal system.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.