87 So. 3d 84 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
August 2015
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 626 So. 2d 185 - Popple v. State · 668 So. 2d 954 - Terry v. State · 931 So. 2d 857 - Schoenwetter v. State · State v. Williams · 19 So. 3d 973 - G.M. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress comes to the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness, and the court must interpret the evidence and reasonable inferences and deductions therefrom in a manner most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s ruling. An appellate court is bound by the trial court’s findings of historical fact if those findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence. However, an appellate court applies a de novo standard of review to the mixed questions of law and fact that ultimately determine constitutional issues.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Collins v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.