Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

87 Tex. Crim. 127

219 S.W 828

Pulliam v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 1920

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1920-03-17

<p>Robbery—Indictment—Statement of Facts—Practice on Appeal.</p> <p>In the absence of a statement of fact and bills of exception, there being a valid indictment, etc., complaints with regard to the introduction of testimony cannot be considered on appeal and the judgment below must be affirmed.</p>

Decided 1920-03-17

LATTIMORE, Judge.

¶1 In this case, appellant was convicted in the Criminal District Court of Tarrant County, of the offense of robbery, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of five years.

¶2 The record is before us without bills of exception, or statement of facts. We have examined the indictment and the charge of the court, which seem to be in accordance with law;' and no exceptions to the latter were'taken, on the trial.

¶3 In his motion for a new trial, appellant makes a number of complaints with regard to the introduction of testimony, but same are of no weight before us, in the absence of a statement of facts.

¶4*128 There being no errors complained of which appear to be of weight, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

¶5 Affirmed.

/87/texcrim/127 · .json · Public domain