Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 U.S. 520 - Pollard v. Bailey

Pollard v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

87 U.S. 520 · 1874

Citation profile

278
cited by 278 later decisions
48
cited 48 times by the Supreme Court
30
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

60 federal appellate · 21 district · 60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 278 later decisions (48 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2019 · most notably Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn. (1981), Jett v. Dallas Independent School District (1989)

60 federal appellate · 21 district · 60 state decisions — followed in 30 states

440187418801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 278 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A general liability created by statute without a remedy may be enforced by an appropriate common-law action. But where the provision for the liability is coupled with a provision for a special remedy, that remedy, and that alone, must be employed.””
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Each stockholder is bound for the debts in proportion to his stock, llis liability is not limited to (the par value of his stock, neither is he bound absolutely for the payment of the full amount of that. He must pay a sum which shall bear the same proportion to the whole indebtedness that his stock bears to the whole capital, and is not required to pay more. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to decide what effect the insolvency of any of the stockholders would have upon the liability of such as are solvent.- It is certain that no stockholder is liable for more than his proportion of the debts. This proportion can only he ascertained upon an account of the debts and stock and a pro rata distribution of the indebtedness among the several stockholders. The proper action, therefor, to enforce the liability is one in which such an account can be stated and distribution made. Such an action calls specially for the exercise of the powers of a court of equity, which can bring before it all the necessary parties and adjust all their rights. Every stockholder, when called upon to perform his obligations, has the right to require that the extent thereof shall then he determined once for all, as well that which he is under to his associate stockholders as that to the creditors.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The intention of the legislature, when properly ascertained, must govern in the construction of every statute. For such purpose, the whole statute must be examined. Single sentences and single provisions are not to be selected and construed by themselves, but the whole must be taken together.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.