Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 U.S. 575 - Longstreth v. Pennock

Longstreth v. Pennock’s Empirical Analysis

87 U.S. 575 · 1874

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 1971
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 36 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1971 · most notably Henderson v. Samuel Mayer (1912), In re West Side Paper Co. (1908)

21 federal appellate · 36 district · 1 state decisions

31018741880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Treat v. Jemison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The goods or chattels being in or upon any messuage, lands or tenements which are or shall be demised for life or years or otherwise, taken by virtue of an execution and liable to the distress of the landlord, shall be liable for the payment of any sums of money due for rent at the time of taking such goods in execution: Provided that such rent shall not exceed one year's rent:””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The assignee acquired his title to the movable property found on the demised premises, subject to the rights of all other persons. The rout in question was for a period which terminated when the assignee took possession, and the entire period was within a year of that time. Before the commencement of the proceedings in bankruptcy, the defendants in error might have distrained; and it is agreed that the property upon the premises was more than sufficient to satisfy the demand. The statute of Pennsylvania of June 16, 1836, provides that, where property under such circumstances is seized and sold under execution, the rent due for a period not exceeding one year shall be paid first out of the proceeds of the sale. This case is within the equity of that statute. The question presented is one belonging to the local law of Pennsylvania. We think it was correctly decided by the Circuit Court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The assignee acquired his title to the movable property found on the demised premises, subject to the rights of all other persons.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.