Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 Utah 493 - Taylor v. Moore

Taylor v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Estate Counseling Service, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (1962), Pace v. Parrish (1952)

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions

1001935194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shappirio v. Goldberg · Le Vine v. Whitehouse · Jones Min. Co. v. Cardiff Min. & Mill. Co. · Ferrell v. Wiswell · Gibson v. Jensen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party who has opportunity of knowing the facts constituting the alleged fraud cannot be inactive and afterwards allege a want of knowledge that arose by reason of his own laches and negligence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is well settled by repeated decisions of this court that where a party desires to rescind upon the ground of misrepresentation or fraud, he must, upon the discovery of the fraud, announce his purpose and adhere to it. If he continues to treat the property as his own the right of rescission is gone, and the party will be held bound by the contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.