Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 Wash. 2d 129 - State v. Young

87 Wash. 2d 129 - State v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
5
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently June 2009 · most notably 88 Wash. 2d 899 - State v. Partin (1977), 97 Wash. 2d 493 - State v. Grisby (1982)

43 state decisions

1701976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 85 Wash. 2d 758 - State v. Gosby · 83 Wash. 2d 797 - State v. O'CONNELL · 84 Wash. 2d 472 - State v. Woo · 78 Wash. 2d 845 - State v. Cerny · 79 Wash. 2d 699 - State v. Music

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “well-connected train of circumstances may be as satisfactory as an array of direct evidence”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “insufficient to support a reconsideration of the rule. Those factors which were mentioned as significant in State v. Woo, supra, were not covered in the appellant's offer of proof. We are not shown what the tests consisted of, what the qualifications of the examiners were, what the standards were which they followed, and what evidence there is of reliability.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'logically, naturally, and by reasonable inference . . . prove'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.