Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 Wash. 2d 374 - State v. Arndt

87 Wash. 2d 374 - State v. Arndt’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

210
cited by 210 later decisions
13
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

210 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 210 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green (1980), 90 Wash. 2d 443 - State v. Workman (1978)

210 state decisions — followed in 13 states

720197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bell v. United States · Prince v. United States · United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. · People v. Failla · People v. . Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 210 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the title of the act; (2) whether there is a readily perceivable connection between the various acts set forth; (3) whether the acts are consistent with and not repugnant to each other; and (4) whether the acts may inhere in the same transaction.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it is unnecessary to a guilty verdict that there be more than unanimity concerning guilt as to the single crime charged . . . regardless of unanimity as to the means by which the crime is committed provided there is substantial evidence to support each of the means charged.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “unanimity of the jury as to the mode of commission is not required.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.