87 Wash. App. 433 - State v. Mutch’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably 134 Wash. 2d 588 - State v. Morley (1998), In Re Personal Restraint of Lavery (2005)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on State v. Thorne · State v. Manussier · 74 Wash. 2d 141 - State v. McDonald · 77 Wash. App. 532 - State v. Duke · 72 Wash. App. 34 - State v. Villegas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“); State v. Duke, 77 Wash.App. 532, 535 , 892 P.2d 120 (1995) (Washington court”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Russell · State v. Hickman“To determine whether a foreign conviction counts toward an offender score, the sentencing court first compares the elements of the crime [of which the defendant was convicted] in the out-of-state statute to those of comparable Washington statutes in effect when the crime was committed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Bunting · State v. Russell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.