Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 Wash. App. 515 - State v. Pesta

87 Wash. App. 515 - State v. Pesta’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably 90 Wash. App. 890 - State v. Picard (1998), Rideout v. Rideout (2002)

29 state decisions

230199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 110 Wash. 2d 682 - State v. Scott · 114 Wash. 2d 828 - State v. Fjermestad · 100 Wash. 2d 188 - Brown v. FIRE PROTEC. DIST.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The provisions of this title shall be construed according to the fair import of their terms but when the language is susceptible of differing constructions it shall be interpreted to further the general purposes stated in this title.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “shall include (1) a schedule for the child's time with each parent, (2) designation of the child's temporary residence, (3) allocation of decision-making authority for the child, (4) provisions for temporary support, and (5) restraining orders, if applicable. RCW 26.09.184(2) provides that the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] parent of a child is guilty of custodial interference in the first degree if the parent takes . . . the child, with the intent to deny access, from the other parent having the lawful right to time with the child pursuant to a court-ordered parenting plan.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.